Wikipedia

Search results

Tuesday, 3 March 2015

Unwritten privileges

Crime for Comfort


Zuma's private kingdom. image URL
I am only gonna address this once, so make the circle smaller and come closer. The Nkandla report  has armed a lot of South Africans with okapis(opinions) to attack the president of the Republic Mr Jacob Zuma. I refer to most opinions as "okapis" because they are uniformed, irrational and they cut deep. A typical ghetto approach to crises. We have already have established the fact that Jacob Zuma had an in-fringe benefit from the money allocated to security upgrades at his private homestead. Although our lady " chuck Norris" of politics Thuli Mandonsela did not specify how much Zuma benefited, DA studied her report and calculated on an estimate that Zuma benefited approximately R16.8 million. Lets face it, its never really about the money that was spent right. Its always about the person who benefited and how he deals with the reactions of the public to the issue. I mean if we take this horror of presidents benefiting from tax money four generations back, we will realize a trend. 

President Zuma just like PW Botha, Nelson Mandela and Thabo Mbeki was always in line for what I would like to call "unwritten privileges".
The RSA former presidents PW Botha (left)
 and the nation's father Nelson Mandela deep in discussions
image URL
I know R246 million might seem a little steep but if you look here it is highly evident that all three previous presidents had more or less benefits of the "unwritten privileges". The only differences are the power of the rand, communication methods and efforts and public opinion which is controlled by the above mentioned factors. Zuma's first mistake was failing to apply the three effective ways of getting away with corporate crime, which are; 1. Portray a very compromising character 2. Always have control of the evidence 3. Always address crisis management personally. Failure to apply these basic principles was his downfall as the respected president of the nation.

The ever calm former president of RSA Thabo Mbeki
image URL

The worst part about this is that the most concerned people about the Nkandla issue are the small time ghetto thugs. This goes to show how Zuma needs to up his game if he is to ensure that he holds on to his "unwritten privileges". Some of you are probably stuck somewhere between the differences and similarities of crime and "unwritten privileges". Okay I will briefly define the two. Crime is an action or omission which affects other individuals negatively (in a disastrous manner). "unwritten privileges" are benefits that are indirectly intended for leaders, they are there to be taken and not given. Zuma did what any leader in his shoes would have done. He just failed to apply the necessary damage control methods.
    

10 comments:

  1. I hear you,but my main question is what is it that we can do to ensure that this doesn't happen again in the future as youth because this highly depends on us as people who elect their leaders,should we stop casting our votes or maybe vote for a different ruling party?

    ReplyDelete
  2. The country needs to have one national key point (NKP) for the president which he/she will occupy during his/her period in office. The government must stop building or "upgrading" security measures for presidents at their private homesteads.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. having a strong defense mechanism i like that. i think i will agree with you people have been very hard on president Zuma which i think is unreasonable, I mean every leader eats the states money itsjust that he was not so wise in covering his tracks but thinking about it though. do you think the would have been a difference even if he did, i mean he had a baggage of issues so every wrong thing he does was watched?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. The president's moves were monitored the moment he stepped into office. Jacob Zuma did nothing that the previous presidents did not do. His situation just seems extreme because he did not manage the crises effectively as soon as eyebrows were raised

      Delete
  5. I hear your point, but do you not believe that the president may have abused these "unwritten privileges"?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Not at all! He just had too many eyes watching and not enough fingers to point in the opposite direction

      Delete
  6. I believe that society is using Zuma as a scapegoat for all the problems faced in their own daily lives, however i agree that he did merely what all past leaders did all we can do is find ways to avoid these problems in the future.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I thought Zuma was going to be a good president because it seemed like he could relate to people. All leader need to do what they have to do for security reasons but if Nkandla was funded on tax payers money then he needs to pay it back, it would be taking food from the poor. As for the Okapis/small ghetto thug did he pay back the money he stole for tax payers, its annoying and disrespectful that they turned our parliament and constitution to a mockery...

    ReplyDelete